See real interpretations, not screenshots
Five real SPSS outputs, interpreted in full by the same engine you get when you sign in — in your language, with the tables, ready for your thesis.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Cronbach's Standardized
Alpha Items N of Items
.868 .868 5
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
LS1 3.59 .914 400
LS2 3.56 .874 400
LS3 3.57 .887 400
LS4 3.52 .934 400
LS5 3.63 .901 400
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
LS1 LS2 LS3 LS4 LS5
LS1 1.000 .529 .603 .625 .593
LS2 .529 1.000 .577 .555 .534
LS3 .603 .577 1.000 .579 .540
LS4 .625 .555 .579 1.000 .550
LS5 .593 .534 .540 .550 1.000
Item-Total Statistics
Corrected Item- Squared Cronbach's
Scale Mean if Scale Variance Total Multiple Alpha if Item
Item Deleted if Item Deleted Correlation Correlation Deleted
LS1 14.27 8.622 .721 .529 .833
LS2 14.29 9.076 .662 .444 .848
LS3 14.29 8.841 .700 .495 .838
LS4 14.34 8.594 .705 .502 .837
LS5 14.23 8.908 .670 .453 .846
Scale Statistics
Mean Variance Std. Deviation N of Items
17.85 13.324 3.650 5
RELIABILITY
/VARIABLES=IQ1 IQ2 IQ3 IQ4 IQ5
Page 3
/SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL
/MODEL=ALPHA
/STATISTICS=DESCRIPTIVE SCALE CORR
/SUMMARY=TOTAL.
Reliability
Notes
Output Created 19-MAY-2026 16:19:15
Comments
Input Data - Cronbach's Alpha reliability analysis
- Item-total correlation analysis
- Alpha-if-item-deleted analysis
A reliability analysis was conducted to assess the internal consistency of all scales used in the study. Using the guidelines proposed by George and Mallery (2003), Cronbach's alpha coefficients were interpreted as follows: ≥ .90 = excellent, .80–.89 = good, .70–.79 = acceptable, .60–.69 = questionable, .50–.59 = poor, and < .50 = unacceptable. The LS scale (5 items) yielded a Cronbach's alpha of α = .868, indicating good internal consistency. The IQ scale (5 items) demonstrated good reliability (α = .860), as did the TU scale (5 items; α = .871) and the PI scale (4 items; α = .820). Taken together, all four scales demonstrated good internal consistency, supporting their suitability for use in subsequent analyses.
Item-total correlation analyses were conducted to further evaluate scale quality. Following the criterion recommended by Field (2018), corrected item-total correlations should exceed .30 to indicate that an item is measuring the same underlying construct as the scale. For the LS scale, corrected item-total correlations ranged from .662 to .721, and removing any item would not have improved scale reliability. For the IQ scale, corrected item-total correlations ranged from .664 to .698, with no item deletion improving alpha. For the TU scale, corrected item-total correlations ranged from .680 to .723, and no item deletion would have resulted in a higher alpha coefficient. For the PI scale, corrected item-total correlations ranged from .632 to .647, and no item deletion would have improved reliability. All items across all four scales demonstrated acceptable item-total correlations well above the .30 threshold (Field, 2018), and the alpha-if-item-deleted values confirmed that each item was contributing positively to its respective scale. These findings collectively indicate that all scales possessed satisfactory internal consistency for research purposes.
Table 1: Item-Total Statistics
| Item | Corrected Item-Total r | Alpha if Item Deleted |
|---|---|---|
| LS1 | 0.721 | 0.833 |
| LS2 | 0.662 | 0.848 |
| LS3 | 0.700 | 0.838 |
| LS4 | 0.705 | 0.837 |
| LS5 | 0.670 | 0.846 |
| IQ1 | 0.681 | 0.830 |
| IQ2 | 0.674 | 0.832 |
| IQ3 | 0.664 | 0.835 |
| IQ4 | 0.670 | 0.833 |
| IQ5 | 0.698 | 0.826 |
| TU1 | 0.680 | 0.848 |
| TU2 | 0.723 | 0.837 |
| TU3 | 0.688 | 0.846 |
| TU4 | 0.705 | 0.842 |
| TU5 | 0.685 | 0.846 |
| PI1 | 0.646 | 0.772 |
| PI2 | 0.643 | 0.773 |
| PI3 | 0.647 | 0.771 |
| PI4 | 0.632 | 0.778 |
Note. Items with corrected item-total correlations < .30 may not be measuring the same construct (Field, 2018). All items in the present study exceeded this threshold.
References
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Ready for your own output?
Upload your PDF or paste your text — same quality, ready in minutes.